NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+746%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
