NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
+411%
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Cayman
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
