Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +1342%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy