Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
2192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1477%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Ellesmere
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy