Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +763%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy