NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2245MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
5008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
+12566%
45.98 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Jul 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi III(RX 7000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1287 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
80
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
160
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.96 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.98 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1437 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Navi 31
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XL
(215-145000206)
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
