Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
18064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +24985%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
142
112
Shading Units
18176
56
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
AD102
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy