Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +693%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy