Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250 +383%
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
128
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
M93
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy