Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +751%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
265W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tonga
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy