CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
+958%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
VS
Radeon R9 280X2
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI FirePro V7760
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 6144 SP
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon X1550
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy