Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +958%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy