Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI FirePro V4800

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800 +60%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Redwood
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy