Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1041%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
20
128
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
TU116
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy