Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
16256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +21238%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Sep 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
128
128
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
AD102
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy