Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +4042%
16.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Navi 21
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy