Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +1739%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Polaris 30
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy