Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV516
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy