NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
9632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 260M
0.264 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+12282%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
76
96
Shading Units
9728
32
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
38W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
AD103
N10E-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
