Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +743%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
235W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Hawaii
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy