Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +374%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
TU116
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy