Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
RV516
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
R500
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy