Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1792GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +461%
2.332 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Dec 2009
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GT200B
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy