Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 10
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
12
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
NV41
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Curie
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy