Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +507%
2.332 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
R600
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy