Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (84.10GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
44W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
RV535
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
Pascal
Architecture
R500
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy