Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1762MHz vs 1518MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
2.332 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +16%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 10
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GA107
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy