NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 550

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1392MHz vs 1183MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

256 additional rendering cores

AMD Radeon RX 550 's Advantages

Released 6 months late

Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +76%

2.138 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 550

1.211 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +94%

2337

Radeon RX 550

1200

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +83%

11

Radeon RX 550

6

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +66%

20

Radeon RX 550

12

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +33%

28

Radeon RX 550

21

Battlefield 5 2160p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +142%

17

Radeon RX 550

7

Battlefield 5 1440p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +142%

34

Radeon RX 550

14

Battlefield 5 1080p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +140%

48

Radeon RX 550

20

GTA 5 1080p

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +109%

176

Radeon RX 550

84

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Radeon RX 550

Graphics Card

Oct 2016

Release Date

Apr 2017

GeForce 10

Generation

Polaris

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz

Base Clock

1100 MHz

1392 MHz

Boost Clock

1183 MHz

1752 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

112.1GB/s

Bandwidth

112.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

8

6

SM Count

-

768

Shading Units

512

48

TMUs

32

ROPs

16

-

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

512 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

44.54 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

18.93 GPixel/s

66.82 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

37.86 GTexel/s

33.41 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

1211 GFLOPS

2.138 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1211 GFLOPS

66.82 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

75.71 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W

TDP

50W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

GP107

GPU Name

Lexa

GP107-400-A1

GPU Variant

Lexa PRO (215-0904018)

Pascal

Architecture

GCN 4.0

Samsung

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

14 nm

Process Size

14 nm

3.3 billion

Transistors

2.2 billion

132 mm²

Die Size

103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

6.1

CUDA

-

6.4

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4870

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6510

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster