Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +186%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy