Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +76%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy