Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +52%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV770
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy