Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +158%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Dec 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy