Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +44%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1600
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cypress
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy