Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +872%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
9
512
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT215
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy