NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1785MHz vs 1188MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1630

1.828 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 950

1.825 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 1630 +12%

2102

GeForce GTX 950

1869

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1630 +20%

6

GeForce GTX 950

5

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1630

18

GeForce GTX 950 +11%

20

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1630

30

GeForce GTX 950

30

GeForce GTX 1630

VS

GeForce GTX 950

Graphics Card

Jun 2022

Release Date

Aug 2015

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz

Base Clock

1024 MHz

1785 MHz

Boost Clock

1188 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1653 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

96.00GB/s

Bandwidth

105.8GB/s

Render Config

8

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

512

Shading Units

768

32

TMUs

48

16

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

38.02 GPixel/s

57.12 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.02 GTexel/s

3.656 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

1.828 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.825 TFLOPS

57.12 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

GM206

TU117-150-KA-A1

GPU Variant

GM206-250-A1

Turing

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

90W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

5.2

6.7

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

4

AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon RX 580

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs ATI Radeon HD 5530

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance