NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1785MHz vs 1740MHz)

Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1630

1.828 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +289%

7.127 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce GTX 1630

283

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +550%

1841

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce GTX 1630

6

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +400%

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce GTX 1630

18

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +233%

60

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce GTX 1630

30

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +183%

85

GeForce GTX 1630

VS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Graphics Card

Jun 2022

Release Date

Jan 2022

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz

Base Clock

1545 MHz

1785 MHz

Boost Clock

1740 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

96.00GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

8

SM Count

16

-

Compute Units

-

512

Shading Units

2048

32

TMUs

64

16

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

64

-

RT Cores

16

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.68 GPixel/s

57.12 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

111.4 GTexel/s

3.656 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

7.127 TFLOPS

1.828 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.127 TFLOPS

57.12 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

111.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

GA107

TU117-150-KA-A1

GPU Variant

GA107-140-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

8 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

8.7 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

90W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.6

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

4

AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon RX 580

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA P104 100

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance