Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1785MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +92%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy