Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +154%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy