Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +431%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
27
896
Shading Units
216
56
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT200
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy