NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (2920MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+1579%
47.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2025
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 48
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
