NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+71%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+140%
3566
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1481
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+237%
1607
Radeon Pro WX 3200
476
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Polaris 23
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
