Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
44W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV535
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
Turing
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy