Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Intel Arc A380M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Intel Arc A380M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2000MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
Arc A380M +77%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy