NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Intel Arc A770M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arc A770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 120W)
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
Arc A770M
+486%
13.52 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2932
Arc A770M
+263%
10649
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
1318
Arc A770M
+285%
5078
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
398
Arc A770M
+330%
1714
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
211.2 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
422.4 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.03 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
