Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD FirePro M5800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD FirePro M5800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +343%
2.304 TFLOPS
FirePro M5800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
26W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Madison
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy