Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD FirePro W5170M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD FirePro W5170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1125MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +94%
2.304 TFLOPS
FirePro W5170M
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tropo
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy