Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M6000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +203%
3.103 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
-
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Heathrow
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy