Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W7170M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W7170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +4%
3.103 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
-
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy