Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +708%
3.103 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
-
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV730
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy