Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1515MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +330%
3.103 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1380 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1515 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

48.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
96.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
6.205 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
3.103 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
96.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Topaz
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy