Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +2730%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
29W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF119
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy